Out of Context Images
I sat down with Mumbo Jumbo, a pen, and notebook on my desk, and the entire internet at my disposal. Every cryptic image would become a specimen for examination, a good Atonist explanation. But what we called “Reed glasses” transformed into “Reed contacts” into “Reed lasik surgery”, and now I can’t unsee much of the thesis Reed presented us with. So let’s just get two birds stoned at once; why go down a time consuming rabbit hole of research when I could simply explain that the point of the images is contained within their awkwardness.
Including citations, a bibliography, newspaper excerpts, and the images, all make Mumbo Jumbo at a surface level appear something more like an academic text. This could be a conversation in and of itself of course, but images especially add to this. Usually you see them in the middle part of a non-fiction book or a history textbook, with added captions explaining what is being shown. However, Mumbo Jumbo lacks any captions and really the connection between the text and the images is pretty hard to pull together. I mean, you’d really have to go digging through the bibliography to piece together anything.
Including citations, a bibliography, newspaper excerpts, and the images, all make Mumbo Jumbo at a surface level appear something more like an academic text. This could be a conversation in and of itself of course, but images especially add to this. Usually you see them in the middle part of a non-fiction book or a history textbook, with added captions explaining what is being shown. However, Mumbo Jumbo lacks any captions and really the connection between the text and the images is pretty hard to pull together. I mean, you’d really have to go digging through the bibliography to piece together anything.
With the Mu’tafikah plot, Reed makes the point about how art museums are a place for “art detention”, placing meaningful parts of culture in a cold and disconnected context. Non-western art, particularly African and Asian art, has been stolen and appropriated. The notecards simply tell the purpose of the object and a general area of origin, as if it were a plant rather than a piece of a dynamic culture. They become “cryptic” artifacts of a dark continent to be explicated by pseudo-academic, chin-stroking audience. The art has lost its original meaning, placed in a totally out-of-context, nonsensical way.
The image in the novel gives us the same feeling - they are probably meaningful images, but they are out of context, placed randomly and without any proper explanation. Maybe the odd god-like figure before chapter 3 has some meaning, but it’s not like you’ll get to know what it is. “Get what it feels like now?”, Reed might say, flipping the tables once again. Perhaps this makes us question what we really learn from images in history textbooks and museums when learning about Africa - are we getting the full picture? What information are we missing? How would it feel if Western history was presented in this way?
Huh. I didn’t think of it that way before, but you’re almost certainly right. Doubtless, if we did go search up each of the images in Mumbo Jumbo, find their source, and do extensive research about the context they were created in, the images would take on a much less “mysterious” tone – and probably would relate more clearly to the story Reed is telling. But the entire point is that we don’t go search up those images. We don’t understand, and we see it as weird. We don’t put in the effort, any more than, in a “world museum,” we don’t actually understand the cultural contexts that created the things we’re seeing. We see those images – and those cultures – as weird, mystical, or strange, because we don’t put in the effort to learn more. Reed just brings that paradigm into the light.
ReplyDeleteThis is a really interesting take on how people learn about history and other societies. I think learning about someone else's culture is incredibly difficult and so much more than just searching up picture of artifacts and trying to analyze the meaning behind this or that. Artifacts do carry a lot of meaning for the people who have actually been immersed in the history.
ReplyDeleteI think that its good history teachers put a lot of energy into teaching us about different cultures throughout history but I've often wondered "what if the lesson Im getting out of the class is drastically different than the actual context". I don't think theres a better way for students to learn about culture than what we do in school, however, I think that there is always more than the superficial analyzation that we conduct in school.